
I personally like to condemn whatever has happened in Ram janam bhoomi Ayodhya.
I blame Late Rajiv Gandhi the ex PM of India and congress for the act related to Babri issue which was the root cause of demolition of Babri structure. Congress is only responsible for the 1992 demolition of the Babri structure in Ram Janam bhumi Ayodhya. Timely intervention by the Congress, which was ruling at the centre at that time, could have prevented the demolition of the Babri Structure,' Even after it received information from various intelligence agencies and other sources that there were plans to raze the structure, the Congress preferred to keep quite. If Congress acted on the information provided by the Intelligence Bureau (IB), the Babri structure demolition would not have taken place,’ such an intervention could have prevented a lot issues and communal clashes that erupted in various parts of the country.
Late ex PM Rajiv Gandhi ordered the locks on the Ram Janmabhoomi Babri structure in Ayodhya removed. Until then, a priest had been permitted to perform puja once a year for the idols installed there in 1949. Now, all Hindus were given access to what they consider as the birthplace of Rama, the prince posthumously deified as an incarnation of Vishnu.
Fundamentally, this decision didn't alter the Ayodhya equation. Architecturally, the building was and remained a Babri structure, while functionally; it had been and continued to be a Hindu temple. That is why in my opinion; not taking this decision wouldn't have changed the Ayodhya developments except in their timing. I think Rajiv Gandhi's decision may have made a big difference.
Historical documents confirm that Hindus continued to go on pilgrimage to the site all through the centuries of Muslim occupation, while no Muslim ever went on pilgrimage there.
Admittedly, a Muslim lobby had been formed which insisted on reoccupying this Hindu sacred site. However, the existing Congress culture notoriously knew how to deal with such problems: give the Muslim lobbyists some ministerial posts, some public largesse for their institutes or a raise in the Hajj subsidies, and they will come around. A small application of this approach was the annulment of Syed Shahabuddin's announced march on Ayodhya in 1988 in exchange for the governmental ban on Salman Rushdie's freshly-released book The Satanic Verses.
After the locks had been removed, India's Marxist intellectuals unchained all their devils in order to prevent the full restoration of the site as a Hindu pilgrimage centre. In particular, they started insisting that there had never been a Hindu temple at the site before a mosque had been imposed on it.
This type of mean minded politics led to the demolition of Babri Structure.
Rajiv Gandhi in 1989 allowed the Shilanyas ceremony, in which the first stone of the planned temple was put in place. In 1990, as opposition leader, he made Chandra Shekhar's minority government organize a scholars' debate on the history of the site, obviously on the assumption that this would confirm the Hindu claim. And so it did, for the anti-temple historians showed up empty-handed when they were asked to provide evidence for an alternative scenario to the temple demolition. In a normal course of events, i.e. without the interference of secularist shrieks and howls, this would have set the stage for the peaceful construction of a new temple in the 1990s, with some compensation for the Muslim community, and the conflict would have been forgotten by now. Instead, the sore has continued to fester. In 1991 Rajiv Gandhi was murdered, and his successors didn't have the good sense to continue his equitable and pragmatic Ayodhya policy.
Liberhan Commission headed by the retired judge of Supreme Court M S Librhan was constituted on December 16, 1992 by an order of the Indian union home ministry following the demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya on 6 December and the riots in Ayodhya. The Commission was expected to submit its report within three months. The delay of 17 years for Liberhan commission is because of congress, congress never wanted the report to come out early. From past more than 5 years ruling congress party was busy misleading and tampering the commission report and when the customized tampered report was done then they brought up the report. They secretly ordered the commission to bring the report during there 100 days agenda to get Muslim sympathy which in terms is a dirty politics of vote bank.
This people have played important role in Babri structure demolition (Late PM P.V Narshima Roa, Ex Chief Minister Kalyan Singh and ex Home Minister S.V Chauhan).
Kalik Ji Maharaj
International President - Shri Ram Sena
Former President - Shiv Sena J&K State
http://www.shriramsena.com/
